3) You told me and many other (on diferent forums) the webside is not a credible source because anyone can write anything on it. That's impossible because whensiton is a online tv guide that get it info from the tv network channel directly. No one can write anything on because its admin uses only.
By definition, I can't be harassing people when THEY are the ones coming to MY page. And I wasn't being rude. I wasn't talking to this person. What they were talking about wasn't even what I was talking about. They thought I was saying something that I didn't say. And there was no reason to message me, as they could have just addressed me in the discussion page. Didn't mean for it to come off in any particular way. And yes. You ARE rude. And a liar. You are still refusing to address me.
Westerhouse wrote: By definition, I can't be harassing people when THEY are the ones coming to MY page. And I wasn't being rude. I wasn't talking to this person. What they were talking about wasn't even what I was talking about. They thought I was saying something that I didn't say. And there was no reason to message me, as they could have just addressed me in the discussion page. Didn't mean for it to come off in any particular way. And yes. You ARE rude. And a liar. You are still refusing to address me.
You are the one being rude. Saying that we aren't providing evidence when we clearly are providing pictures of our evidence. Saying negative things about a new season when most of us want a new season. Byullying people personally when people are giving their own opinions about something. Do you want me to keep going?
No, you haven't. None of you have shown me any screenshots that show that Disney has addressed any sort of call for a fourth season. I don't know what you are talking about. I don't know what the heck you mean by 'negative' about a hypothetical new season. I've repeatedly said that I'd like a fourth season. But even if I WAS saying something 'negative' about a fourth season (which AGAIN, I never did) I have EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO. And you don't get to go around calling people 'rude' for literally nothing more than DISAGREEING with you or calling you out and asking you to substantiate your claims. And please show me EXACTLY where I'm 'bullying' people for giving their opinions. I'll wait. Oh, and while I'm waiting, maybe you both could send me those screenshots you claim to have seen. I'm STILL waiting for them...
This person was insulting me in a discussion page. I did not insult them. I asked them to PM me if they wanted to continue the conversation so as not to waste space on the discussion page. They responded, so I responded as well, assuming they DID want to continue the conversation, seeing as how they responded. They never once told me to stop talking to them.
O.K. It took me long enough to realize what you were saying.
The reason I think the other Male Lions of The Pride Lands are not members of Simba's Pride is because we never see them at Pride Rock. I have to assume this is because that way there is no potential direct challenge to The Royal Bloodline, from within The Pride Lands.
I belive these other Males are Simba's Bannermen not an actual part of the The Pride, but loyal to Simba. In return for this loyalty I belive Simba allowes his Bannermen to Associate with his Lionesses. Hence Tiifu and Zuri's Fathers are explained. As such an arangment is benifical to Simba's Lionesses. As Simba and Nala are a married couple, He would not provied the services to his Lionesses that a Lion in a real life pride would.
So why didn't Simba call uppon his Bannermen when The Outsiders attacked in Lion King 2? Either he did not have enough time to send out the call?
Or more likely he though his Pride was up to the task of defeating The Outsiders.
Possibly. Likely. But I wonder why it's Kion and the lion guard alone who are fighting Scar and his loyalists. Why aren't the lionesses and lions of the PrideLands doing anything? Why aren't even Simba or Nala getting involved?
I had been wondering about that myself. Kiara did tell Tiifu and Zuri that The Royal Family was preparing The Pridelanders to deal with the threat of Scar in "The Underground Adventure". Perhaps Simba is gathering his full Army for a full on attack by Scar's Army. It could also be that after the assassination attempt Nala convinced Simba to keep a lower profile than he otherwise would, so that The Lion Guard can focus on protecting The Pride Lands. I think it is a safe bet that whatever duties Simba is attending to there is a sizable contengent of Lionesses guarding him.
In any event I agree with you, with The Hyenas, Jackals, and Crocs attacking as a Unit these days. You think Simba would have provided some Back Up for The Lion Guard.
Like I sad calling Kion and Fuli's conversations/interactions Flirtatious Banter is a HUGE STRETCH. I can't actually say that there is any. it depends on how you read into what is said. The closest example I can think of is the way that they are looking (sideways) into each others eyes as they sing "What's inside matters so much more than feathers fur or skin" In the song May There Be Peace. It is realy more how the viewer sees it. Because any seemingly Flirtatious Banter could just as easily be seen as Friendly banter between two Friends with a deep/strong friendship. Perhaps Flirtatious Banter is not the right word for it.
Careful Yourself Westerhouse You've been Fussing With A Strong Self-confident Girl. Attitude Misjudged, Persoality misjudged because you do it in a rush, Self-support judged in a such rush misunderstood by you, Knowledge underestimated not friendly to do.
Seriously I barely even understand what you are trying to say. And I know other people on this site have had trouble understanding you as well. It took me like 3 minutes just to realize what this message even meant. If you don't want me to point out your very poor English, stop corresponding with me.
Quit The Fuss. I'm one who knows adults in their seventies their school teachers cared how well they spoke. Plus with you I'm aware you don't look at details of why something is being done / or said so you often blame the other one for your confusion.
I have been. I simply asked him to be more careful with how he worded things because he's very confusing. He said it was because he's autistic and I agreed with that point. It's not my fault if certain things upset him. I wasn't being rude. Just blunt.
He's created to be a villain. Hyenas has always be evil and lions' enemies since the Lion King. He won't defect. Once a villain, always a villain. The writers should be happy enough with a good hyena so that Janja and his clan remain evil. Know how this guy talks to Ford?
First of all, there are several ways you can reach out to him online. Second; why in god's name would I know where Ford Riley lives? Third; you found that thread, why didn't you just comment on it? Fourth; do you REALLY think they would change the story because of the personal tastes of a single fan? Really? This is Disney. Not some fanfiction. Fifth; why does it matter THAT MUCH to you?
Can't you split attitude, and reputation, as well habit facts from job facts at all????????? It doesn't have to be a job to use the two words aid or assistant a lot of the time it's actually someone who just loves being helpful to another person, while you've mentioned job stuff, I'm mentioning my habits. But you're so focused on the job stuff you've been distracted enough to not split the differences. You have enough curiosity to upset yourself as well as show clear impatience.
So Language or attitude don't underestimate me. I've even a few times encouraged and cheered up teens who felt like giving up stuff like art work before they actually gave up forever. I don't just focus on attitude I focus on details in public. Food Banks, Libraries, School Teachers, Office Work, Conservation Managers being cheered up a little because they like my advice. I'm not claiming I work for Disney at all I'm mentioning the habit I've shown the most both ways screen and public buildings.
Quit The Fuss I'm explaing the unnoticed issue on my own side since Rad spoke like it was more than one person so the truth of the problem is clear when he reads stuff. Not to be rude about your own speech.,
There is no good reason to tell people when they shouldn't speak for themselves especially when the basic problem confuses the top leader. So no when I must speak for myself I will, that's part of my courage.
You misunderstood what the key reason was. in this note. Here in this note you're not splitting the differences of self-support skills from what evidence is.