Who else thinks they should include kopa seariosly
Who else thinks they should include kopa seariosly
Disney has said the character was originally named fluffy, but the character got deleted, again, isn’t kopa
Thank you
Agree with @Awesomejawson. The cub is actually Kiara, it's just that they slightly changed her fur colour. To be frank they actually look identical, other than the fur. Kopa's fur is a dark-light brownish kind of thing, and Kiara's is actually closer n fur tone. The body and head shape, eye colour, and most of the other things match Kiara, so it's Kiara.
Well that makes no sense it cant be kiara in both presentations in the lion king rafiki brings the cub to simba and nala but in the lion king 2 simba and nala bring the cub to rafiki so one is kopa one is kiara so there
Okay! But Kopa's still not cannon because he's the way he is. U-N-O-F-F-I-C-A-L
Well, that's your opinion and mine is that Kopa is non fanon.
@Lily Pyle BRUH you can't just say it's not Kiara just because the presentations are different! The first movie came out before the second one, OBVIOUSLY, and the presentations itself is NOT a good argument.
They couldn't recycle the image from the first film, because they had to change Kiara's design a little bit. And anyway just because of ONE little difference it doesn't mean they're entirely different cubs! If you actually want to argue your case right here which I'm sensing that you do, please give a better reason.
Well in some lion king books at the end that the animals all gathered at pride rock to see simba and nalas new born son
@Disneyscripts that's not an opinion, it's a fact Kopa isn't cannon
Boi @Lily Pyle those books aren't canon, they weren't made by disney
What do you think?